Drawing for MIDLITE

USPTO serial 79265361

MIDLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MIDLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clifford D. Hyra

Clifford D. Hyra Fresh IP PLC11710 Plaza America Dr., Ste 2000RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009protective industrial bootsACTIVE—
025work bootsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 19, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 5, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 20, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 30, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance