Drawing for ARIVA

USPTO serial 79265492

ARIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6202616Status 781
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 24, 2020
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Agency services for booking hotel accommodation; arranging hotel accommodation; hotel accommodation services; hotel services; making hotel reservations for others; making reservations and bookings for temporary lodging; providing a website featuring information in the field of hotels and temporary accommodations for travellers; providing temporary accommodation at hotels; providing information and advice on hotels and restaurants to tourists and business travelers; providing information in the field of temporary lodging and accommodations; residential hotel services; resort hotel services; preparation of food and beverages; contract food and beverage servicesSECTION 16A - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2025C6AFCANCELLATION UNDER 16A FULL
May 20, 2025BXNTNOTICE OF TERMINATION ISSUED - EXPUNGEMENT
Feb 7, 2025BXPIPROCEEDING INSTITUTED - EXPUNGEMENT
Feb 6, 2025BX3RPETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO 30 DAY LETTER - EXPUNGEMENT
Jan 8, 2025BDXNNOTICE OF INCOMPLETE PETITION ISSUED - EXPUNGEMENT
Dec 30, 2024BPXRASSIGNED TO REX/EXP PROCEEDING STAFF
Oct 4, 2024BPETNOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF E/R PETITION TO REGISTRANT'S EMAIL
Oct 4, 2024BPREPETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT RECEIVED
Mar 21, 2021FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 26, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 25, 2021FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 24, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 8, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 22, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 22, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 16, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 3, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 3, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 30, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 24, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 23, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 3, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 30, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 22, 2019LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 15, 2019SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance