USPTO serial 79265558
FITDOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FITDOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices attached to pet collars that incorporate microprocessors and accelerometers for detecting, storing, reporting, monitoring, uploading and downloading fitness training, and physical activity data to the Internet; computer and mobile software for tracking, motivation and compliance with a health and fitness program for pets; circuit boards provided with integrated circuits for internet of things (loT) enabled devices; electronic publications, downloadable; intelligence application program for downloadable wireless terminal; downloadable smart phone application (software); electronic collars to train animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for controlling networked devices in the internet of things (loT); hosting a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software allowing web site users to monitor and track health and fitness program for pets; design and development of computer hardware and software, including design and providing temporary use of non-downloadable software in the field of weight maintenance, weight loss, good physical fitness and health and nutrition, and creating web pages in the field of weight maintenance, weight loss, good physical fitness and health and nutrition; scientific and technological services; technical consultancy in relation to research services relating to foods and dietary supplement; programming of software for Internet portals, chatrooms, chat lines and Internet forums; hosting of e-commerce platforms on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |