USPTO serial 79265621
HONOR 9S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HONOR 9S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Portable media players; cameras [photography]; smart glasses (data processing); covers for smartphones; driving recorder; set-top box; wearable computers; laptop computers; sleeves for laptops; headphones; mobile power (rechargeable battery); wearable activity trackers; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; virtual reality headsets; downloadable graphics for mobile phones; telecommunication apparatus in the form of jewellery; wearable video display monitors; modems; notebook computers; network communication equipment; camcorders; digital photo frames; smart watch (data processing); cases for smartphones; audio interfaces; personal digital assistants [PDAs]; smartphones; cabinets for loudspeakers; loudspeakers; headsets; chargers for electric batteries; batteries, electric; selfie sticks [hand-held monopods]; USB cable; smart ring (data processing); protective films adapted for smartphones; self-timer for mobile phones; security surveillance robots; selfie lenses; computer programs, recorded; computer software applications, downloadable; tablet computers; microphones; sound transmitting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |