USPTO serial 79265752
CONCITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONCITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Compilation, systemization and collection of data in a database; analysis and evaluation of data in a central file; establishment of commercial networks of partners and suppliers; advice for conducting commercial transactions; consultancy in relation to the acquisition of products and services; providing advice and services in relation to the supply of products for third parties; provision of sales areas online for sellers and buyers of goods and services; purchasing of goods and services for other businesses; processing services for orders and delivery and invoice processing; computerized inventory monitoring services; computerized online ordering services; computerized file management services; wholesale and retail sale; retail sale software, in particular via global electronic networks (the Internet); retail sale of all types of products, in particular concrete; retail services or wholesale services in the concrete sector; import and export agency services; e-commerce services, namely, providing information on products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes; statistical analysis and documentation services; commercial management in the field of transport and delivery services; supply chain management services; provision of online information on the selection of goods via a global computer network; outsourced administrative services for businesses; promotion of the goods and services of others; winning contracts for the purchase and sale of goods and/or services on behalf of third parties; collection of goods on behalf of third parties, except for the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase them | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |