USPTO serial 79265876
BONANZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BONANZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk and milk products; oils and fats for food; milk-based beverages; seeds prepared for human consumption; sashimi; prepared coconut; dried or desiccated coconut; coconut milk; coconut chips; coconut bars; almond milk; pickles; olives (prepared); fruit salads; meat and vegetable extracts; prepared nuts; processed nuts; mixtures of nuts and dried fruits; nut butter; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, eggs, soya or vegetables; snacks consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, eggs, soya or vegetables; falafel; tofu; soya; dried or processed soya beans; soya milk; nut milk; oat milk; rice milk; preparations made from nut milk, soya milk, oat milk and rice milk; soya yoghurt; beans; yoghurts; yoghurt drinks; salads; fruit chips, vegetable chips, soya chips; crisps; vegetable crisps; edible seaweed and snacks thereof; soups; instant miso soup; fermented soy beans; fruit preserves; vegetable preserves; cheese; cheese spreads; cheese dips; dairy, fruit, vegetable and meat-based food spreads; dips; burger patties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |