USPTO serial 79265934
COODOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANDERSON, CASSONDRA CR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COODOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; commercial business management; office functions; dissemination of advertising material (leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, samples); arranging subscriptions to telecommunication services for others; presentation of goods on all communication media, for retail purposes; document reproduction; computerized file management service; web site traffic optimization; online advertising on a computer network; rental of advertising time on all communication media; publication of advertising texts; dissemination of advertisements; advice regarding communication (advertising); public relations; advice regarding communication (public relations) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software development; software development (design); software installation; maintenance of software; updating of software; software rental; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; services provided by consultants relating to computer hardware design and development; digitization of documents; software as a service (SaaS); cloud computing; information technology (IT) consultancy; hosting of servers; graphic arts design services; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |