USPTO serial 79266062
THE NAXOS APOTHECARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE NAXOS APOTHECARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J Villapol
Joseph J Villapol Kudman Trachten Aloe LLP350 Fifth Avenue, 68th Fl.New York, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning and room fragrancing preparations; essential oils and aromatic extracts being perfume; cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing campground facilities; reservation of hotel rooms for travellers; boarding house services; hotel services, namely, managing guests' arrivals and departures; boarding house bookings; accommodation bureau services, namely, making reservation of hotel and boarding house rooms for others; washoku restaurant services; personal chef services; canteen services; hotel services; tourist home services; bar services; udon and soba restaurant services; self-service cafeteria services; rental of meeting rooms; motel services; restaurant services; snack-bar services; rental of temporary accommodation | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Pharmacy advice, namely, medical advice relating to pharmaceuticals; health counselling; depilatory waxing; manicuring; health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; speech therapy services; chiropractic services; beauty salon services; visagists' services; solarium services; nursing home services; body piercing; hospital services; physiotherapy; animal-assisted therapy; public bath services for hygiene purposes; massage; services of a psychologist; rental of sanitation facilities; palliative care; rest home services; speech therapy; tattooing; alternative medicine services; hairdressing services; medical advice for individuals with disabilities; aromatherapy services; medical equipment rental; sauna services; Turkish bath services; medical screening; preparation of prescriptions by pharmacists; opticians' services; nursing, medical; medical services; sanatorium services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |