USPTO serial 79266386
MIGHTYSHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6110003Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2020
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MIGHTYSHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip L. Kim
Phillip L. Kim IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate MallSuite 200San Diego, CA 92121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metalworking machines; machine parts, namely, blades; cutting tools as machinery, namely, milling cutters, hobbing cutters; broaches being machine tools; gear cutters being machine tools; cemented carbide cutting tools; anti-corrosive cemented carbide cutting tools; anti-abrasive cemented carbide cutting tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIDEC MACHINE TOOL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Machine Tool Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Machine Tool Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MIGHTYSHIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 21, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |