Drawing for MIKA

USPTO serial 79266423

MIKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore R. Remaklus

Theodore R. Remaklus Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical instruments for use in orthopedic field and surgical apparatus and instruments; surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; prosthesis, namely, joint prostheses; orthopaedic joint implants made of artificial materials; medical and surgical devices and instruments for fixing and inserting prostheses and orthopaedic implants; plates in the nature of orthopaedic surgical implants comprised of artificial material; orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopedic supports; suture materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2021MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 8, 2021ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 7, 2021EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 12, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 18, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance