Drawing for FLEXLINE

USPTO serial 79266446

FLEXLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

REBECCA LIEBOWITZ

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric cables and battery leads and electrical connectors for use with telecommunication equipment; optical fibres and optical fibre connectors; conductive fibres, namely, fluoride glass fibres and glass fibre-optic cables and electrical connectors for fluoride glass fibres and glass fibre-optic cables; coaxial cables and coaxial cable connectors; jumper cables and jumper cable connectorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 28, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 9, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 9, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 30, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 20, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Nov 22, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 23, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 23, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 25, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 8, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 7, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2019SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance