Drawing for PROVER TRIDENT

USPTO serial 79266474

PROVER TRIDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6132478Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2020
Examiner
KLUWE, CHERYL D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROVER TRIDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison Strickland Ricketts

Allison Strickland Ricketts FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th FlNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Registered recorded computer programs for verifying systems; recorded computer applications programs for configuring data processing equipment in accordance with pre-established criteria; generic recorded software modules implementing decisions procedures, each for a certain logic for various safety critical applications for rail control systems; recorded computer aided software engineering (CASE) applications; registered recorded computer programs for verifying hardware and software systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Arranging and conducting of seminars; provision of introductory and advanced courses on the topic of integration of computer systems and provision of general courses related to the application of formal verification technology; teaching and training in the field of computer programs; practical training taught via demonstration in the fields of computer programming and safety verification of hardware and software systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Research and development services regarding new products in the field of computer programming and safety verification; computer programming; updating and verifying of computer programs for third parties; consultancy in the field of systems development and verification of computer systems; research and development services in the field of formal verification technology; industrial design; engineering services related to special software modules, namely, equivalence checking of combinational circuits being chips and design and development of automated verification solutions based on model checking techniquesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 15, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 25, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2020GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 17, 2020GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 17, 2020CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 13, 2020ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 31, 2020PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 19, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2019SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance