Drawing for SENSING WHAT MATTERS

USPTO serial 79266520

SENSING WHAT MATTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 405
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSING WHAT MATTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley M. Stohry

Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP212 W. 10th St., Suite A-285Indianapolis, IN 46202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring signaling, analyzing, controlling and regulating apparatus and instruments, namely, temperature sensors, flow sensors, humidity sensors, conductivity sensors, sensors for the analysis of biological media, pressure sensorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Engineering services; sensor and measuring instrument design and development services; industrial analysis, design and research services relating to sensors and measuring instruments for automation industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2020TRPTREQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - TOTAL—
Jul 27, 2020ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2020TRDEREQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION DENIED—
Feb 14, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2020ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance