USPTO serial 79266576
KLARABARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RISO, MARK E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLARABARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Auctioneering; demonstration of goods; business management of hotels; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; organization of fashion shows for promotional purposes; organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; retail services for works of art provided by art galleries; sales promotion for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |