USPTO serial 79266602
-JOMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with -JOMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hand lotions; hand cream; age spot reducing cream for cosmetic use; beauty gels; cosmetic nourishing creams; anti-aging cream for cosmetic use; eye pencils; loose face powder; loose powder; rouge; liquid rouge; liquid eyeliner; liquid foundation; face powder in the form of paste; lip gloss; lip liner; lip balm; lipstick; lip cream; lip pencil; lip primer; mascara; blemish balm cream; eye liner; eyeliner pencil; eye shadow; eye treatment cream; foundation creams; foundation; moisturizing lotion [cosmetics]; body oils; sun-block lotion; sunscreen cream; after-shave emulsions; hair dyes and bleaching products; hair colorants; hair conditioner; night cream; skin fresheners for men; cosmetic cream for firming skin around eyes; under eye creams; eye wrinkle removing creams; day creams; cosmetics in the form of lotions; skin lightening creams; skin lotions; skin toners; skin creams; cc creams; eye lotions; eye cream; nourishing cream [cosmetics]; lip glosses; anti-wrinkle cream, facial lotions; facial oils; facial cream; facial toner; face serum; facial scrubs; make-up primer; cream for whitening the skin | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |