Drawing for BEET IT

USPTO serial 79266848

BEET IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6039422Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2020
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BEET IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian P. Gregg

Brian P. Gregg McNees Wallace & Nurick100 Pine StreetHarrisburg, PA 17108United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietetic foods and beverages adapted for medical useACTIVE—
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy and sports nutritional shots and drinks; fruit and vegetable drinks and fruit and vegetable juices; syrups for making beverages; shandy; de-alcoholized drinks, namely, de-alcoholized beers and wines; non-alcoholic beers and winesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2026ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 18, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 26, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 15, 2020IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2020IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 3, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 19, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2019SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance