Drawing for TP TEKNO PROGET

USPTO serial 79267393

TP TEKNO PROGET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6015925Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 24, 2020
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TP TEKNO PROGET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paulo A. de Almeida

Paulo A. de Almeida Patel & Almeida, P. C.16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric welding machines; gas welding machines; autogenous soldering machines; electric soldering machines; gas soldering machines; electric arc welding apparatus; gas-operated welding apparatus; gas-operated soldering apparatus; electric soldering apparatus; current generatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Lighting installations and lighting reflectors, in particular mobile light towersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 24, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 29, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 7, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 23, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance