USPTO serial 79267446
SCRIBBLR.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCRIBBLR.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Novak
Paul Novak Hackler Daghighian Martino & Novak10900 Wilshire Blvd.Ste. 300Los Angeles, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Transcription services, namely, message and recorded transcription services; transcription of communications, namely, office functions and assistance in management of business activities; conference call transcription services; medical transcription services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Subtitling; preparing subtitles for movies; captioning, namely, production of closed caption television programs; closed captioning of films, videos and audio in the nature of production of closed caption television programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |