USPTO serial 79267675
YAKI BE-FUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6087815Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2020
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with YAKI BE-FUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simor L. Moskowitz
Simor L. Moskowitz Westerman, Hattori, LLP8500 Leesburg Pike, Ste 7500Tysons, VA 22182United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Noodles; rice noodles; Chinese noodles; Chinese rice noodles; instant noodles; instant Chinese noodles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KENMIN SHOKUHIN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KENMIN SHOKUHIN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KENMIN SHOKUHIN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named YAKI BE-FUN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |