Drawing for HIGMILL

USPTO serial 79267699

HIGMILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6039441Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2020
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HIGMILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph D. Kuborn

Joseph D. Kuborn Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP790 North Water StreetSuite 2200Milwaukee, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Milling and crushing machines, namely, mills and crushers, particularly electric mills, mills for chemical treatments, mills for grinding installations, mills for grinding and crushing, particularly for grinding of ores and minerals and crushing of ores and minerals for industrial purposes; Machine tools and mechanical tools for milling and crushing machines, namely, for mills and crushers, particularly for electric mills, for mills for chemical treatments, for mills for grinding installations, for mills for grinding and crushing, particularly for grinding of ores and minerals and crushing of ores and minerals for industrial purposesACTIVE—
040Treatment of materials by grinding and crushing, particularly grinding of ores and minerals, crushing of ores and mineralsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 10, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 8, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 7, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 26, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance