Drawing for KOHINOOR

USPTO serial 79267809

KOHINOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KOHINOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R Peter Spieds

R Peter Spieds Dineff Tradeamrk Law Limited160 N Wacker DrSuite 500Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pulse flour for food; gram flour; chickpea flour; flours made from pulses and chickpeasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 19, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance