USPTO serial 79268299
RADIOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RADIOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; x-ray image software; software used for medical purposes; software for x-ray tomography; artificial intelligence equipment; artificial intelligence software for analysis; artificial intelligence healthcare software; software in the field of artificial intelligence, powerful computing, deep learning and machine learning; software for collecting, storing and manipulating data; software with a learning system | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provision of non-downloadable computer software; provision of non-downloadable computer software for use in the fields of artificial intelligence, powerful computing, deep learning and machine learning; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software with a machine learning system; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for collecting, storing and manipulating data; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software withartificial intelligence technology; research and consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence, machine learning, high performance computing, deep learning and reinforcement learning; design and development of artificial intelligence systems; software as a service (SaaS) services; scientific research in the field of radiology; medical research in the field of radiology; genetic research; biotechnological investigations; medical research services | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, in particular in the field of radiology; x-ray examination for medical purposes; rental of medical x-ray equipment; x-ray image form | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |