USPTO serial 79268572
MAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD PLAYFAIR
EDWARD PLAYFAIR ADAMS AND REESE LLP424 CHURCH STREETSUITE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Aerated beverages with coffee, cocoa or chocolate base; aerated drinks with coffee, cocoa or chocolate base; beverages consisting principally of coffee; beverages made from coffee; beverages with coffee base; chicory based coffee substitute; coffee; coffee beverages, namely, coffee-based beverages with a coffee, cocoa or chocolate base; coffee drinks; coffee-based beverages; decaffeinated coffee; mixtures of coffee and chicory; mixtures of coffee and malt for food purposes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | RGTR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 20, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |