USPTO serial 79268769
MAESTRO MASSIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAESTRO MASSIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claire Zopf
Claire Zopf Z IP Law PLLC1015 Elm Street Suite 201Manchester, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cookies; malt biscuits; petit-beurre biscuits; buns; sweetmeats in the nature of candy; cocoa; caramels in the nature of candy; peppermint sweets; chocolate; chocolate-based spreads; confectionery made of sugar; pralines; cakes; natural sweeteners; pies; fondants in the nature of confectionery; chocolate spreads containing nuts; custard; fruit jellies in the nature of confectionery, namely, fruit jelly candy; pastry dough; pastries; petits fours in the nature of cakes; tarts; candy; pastilles in the nature of confectionery; chocolate candies; gummy candies; croissants; crème caramels; cookie dough; cocoa-based ingredients for confectionery products; meringues; panettone; nougat; sponge cakes; coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; filled brioches; baked goods, namely, crumble; canapes; fresh pies; chocolate spreads for use on bread; jam buns; chocolates; chocolate for confectionery and bread; chocolate for toppings; chocolate spreads; sweets in the nature of candy; pandoro; bakery goods; confectionery made of sugar in the form of imitation chocolate; confectionery made of sugar in the form of imitation custard; chocolate truffles in the nature of confectionery; confectionery made of sugar in the form of tablet; tiramisu; doughnuts; cream buns; brownies; cheesecakes; rolled wafers in the nature of biscuits; wafers; prepared desserts in the nature of pastries; pastry shells; muffins; puff pastry; shortcrust pastry; fresh pasties; long-life pastry; sponge fingers in the nature of cakes; covered tarts; chewing candy; milk tablet candy; confectionery made of sugar in the form of foam; filled sweetmeats; milk chocolates; filled chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail, online retail, wholesale, and online wholesale store services, featuring foodstuffs, fruits, vegetables, jellies, jams, compotes, fruit and vegetable spreads, snacks, savory snacks, flavorings and seasonings, bakery goods, chocolate and desserts, pastries, bread, cakes, tarts and biscuits in the nature of cookies, sweets in the nature of candy, candy bars, cereal bars and energy bars, coffee, tea, cocoa and substitutes thereof, processed grains, baked goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services; food and drink catering; take-out food and drink restaurant services; bar and restaurant services; services for providing food and drink; consultancy services in the field of culinary arts; information and advice in relation to the preparation of meals; take-out restaurant services; café services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |