USPTO serial 79268790
PRINTEMPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRINTEMPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIE ANNE MASTROVITO
MARIE ANNE MASTROVITO ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE, 10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, lingerie, sleepwear, caps, hats, jackets, coats, socks, scarves, belts for clothing, slacks, shorts, swimwear, sweatpants; footwear; headwear; all of the foregoing sold only in retail stores bearing the same mark and with a unity of control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2023 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 12, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |