USPTO serial 79269311
PORTZAMPARC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERDMAN, RACHEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PORTZAMPARC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Wright
Amy Wright Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLPOne Indiana Square, Suite 3500Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; shelves; chests of drawers; sideboards; couches; desks being furniture, armchairs; seats, benches, benches being seats; furniture, namely, sales and display counters; bedding being pillows, mattresses, and bolsters, and excluding bed linen; Household décor made primarily of plaster and plastic, said décor not being Christmas tree decorations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and training services in the field of architecture, urban planning, industrial design, interior architecture and museography; Providing information relating to organizing community cultural activities; publication of books, magazines, and newsletters; film production; photography services; Providing information relating to organizing contests; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; organizing and conducting colloquiums and conferences in the field of architecture, urban planning, interior architecture, and museography; multimedia publishing of online electronic books and periodicals; desktop publishing for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Architect design services, technical consulting services in the field of architect design; engineering services, particularly technical project planning in the field of architect design; Architect design services, namely, the drawing up of architect plans and models for others; architectural research; research in the field of building construction and urban planning; Architect design for real estate building construction; Advisory services, namely, the blueprint construction drafting; urban furniture, interior décor, and interior tool design services; design of interior decor; interior design service; furniture design services; graphic arts design; industrial fashion design consulting service; furniture design services, namely, the design and drawing of furniture and street furniture; consulting in the field of architecture, interior architecture, interior decoration, urban planning, fashion design, and museography; research and development of new products for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Madame Elizabeth de Portzamparc
- Other trademarks owned by Monsieur URVOY de PORTZAMPARC
- Other trademarks owned by Monsieur Christian de Portzamparc
- Other trademarks owned by Monsieur URVOY de PORTZAMPARC
- Other trademarks owned by Madame JARDIM NEVES épouse
- Other trademarks owned by Madame JARDIM NEVES épouse URVOY de PORTZAMPARC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PORTZAMPARC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |