USPTO serial 79269461
JAPANESE BEAN TO BAR CHOCOLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADCLIFF, BRENT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JAPANESE BEAN TO BAR CHOCOLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring foods and beverage; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring liqueurs; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring chocolate; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring confectionery, bread and buns; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring milk and dairy products; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring carbonated drinks and fruit beverages; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring chocolate-based beverages; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring tea, coffee and cocoa; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring roasted cacao bean; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring unroasted cacao bean; wholesale and retail store services, and on-line retail store services featuring processed food | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing of food and drink, namely, bar services, café services, cafeteria services, catering services, restaurant services, self-service restaurant services, snack bar services, canteen services, take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |