USPTO serial 79269546
R IRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TULLY, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R IRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telescopes; telescopic sights for artillery; integrated circuits; infrared sensors; optical sensors; photoelectric sensors; protection device for personal use against traffic accidents, namely, personal safety driving assistant system for mobile vehicles; electrical and electronic burglar alarms; fire alarms; electric and electronic video surveillance installations; infrared surveillance cameras; thermal imaging cameras; passive infrared detectors; tool measuring instruments; surveying instruments; optical lenses; optical scanners; optical receivers; semi-conductors; infrared detectors; monoculars; binoculars; thermal imaging monoculars and binoculars; optical inspection apparatus; temperature indicators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Raytron Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by YANTAI IRAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Raytron Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named R IRAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |