USPTO serial 79269682
CATFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CATFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANCES M. JAGLA
FRANCES M. JAGLA CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for loading and unloading catalysts; machines for loading and unloading materials into inert reactors | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Construction, servicing, cleaning, maintenance and repair of industrial plants in the nature of oil-refining reactors and oil refineries; building construction, servicing, cleaning and maintenance of petroleum refineries and structures for processing petroleum and chemical products; servicing, cleaning and maintenance of machines for oil refining, for processing petroleum and chemical products, for charging and removing catalyst reactors and charging of inert materials in reactors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |