USPTO serial 79269698
TORISHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITCHELL, GABRIAL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TORISHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail services or wholesale services for fried chicken; retail services or wholesale services for chicken nuggets; retail services or wholesale services for boxed lunches including fried chicken; retail services or wholesale services for boxed lunches including chicken nuggets; retail services or wholesale services for chicken meat and processed chicken food; retail services or wholesale services for boxed lunches including chicken; retail services or wholesale services for foods and beverages; business management consulting services in the field of restaurant management; business management consulting services in the field of franchise business; advertising and publicity services; promoting the goods and services of others through the administration of sales and promotional incentive schemes involving trading stamps; business management analysis or business consultancy; marketing research or analysis; providing information concerning commercial sales; import- export agency services; document reproduction; office functions, namely, filing, in particular documents or magnetic tapes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |