Drawing for EPICAP

USPTO serial 79269779

EPICAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6004762Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2020
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPICAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Non-metallic caps for bottles and vessels for beverages; non-metallic sliding caps for bottles and vessels for beverages; non-metallic plastic locking caps for bottles that cover openings for tamper evidence; plastic lids for bottles and vessels for beverages; bottle plugs being stoppers for bottles, not of glass, metal or rubber; non-metallic covers, namely, plastic covers for containers for capsules; reusable non-metallic bottle capsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Non-metallic manually actuated pump dispensers for attachment to bottles, vessels and covers for beverages for use in dispensing liquids; non-metallic, plastic water bottles, sold empty; drinking bottles for sports, sold empty; reusable plastic water bottles sold emptySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 10, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 24, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 20, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance