Drawing for LPC LE PETIT COCO

USPTO serial 79269816

LPC LE PETIT COCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LPC LE PETIT COCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for children; clothing for infants; shirts for children; chemisettes for children; skirts for children; dresses for children; suits for children; jackets [clothing] for children; shoulder wraps [clothing] for children; trousers for children; shorts for children; jerseys for children; t-shirts for children; sweatshirts for children; sweaters for children; underwear for children; nighties for children; pyjamas for children; socks for children; ankle socks for children; undershirt for children; slips [underclothing] for children; headgear for children; headgear for infants; headwear for children; caps for children; visors [headwear] for children; gloves [clothing] for children; belts for children; scarves for children; neckties for children; papillon for children; mackintoshes for children; overcoats for children; coats for children; down jackets for children; swimsuits for children; bathrobe for children; tracksuits [clothing] for children; cagoules for children; anoraks for children; footwear for children; footwear for infants; shoes for children; boots for children; sandals for children; slippers for children; cloth bibs for infants; cloth footwear for infants; snap crotch shirts for infants and children; bodysuits for children and infants; culottes [underclothing] for children and infants; rompers for infants and children; fingerless gloves for infants and children; tights for children; suspenders for children; bandanas [neckerchiefs] for children; foulards [clothing articles] for children; ear muffs [clothing] for children; gilets for children; chin straps [clothing] for children; petticoats for children; jumper suits for children; mantles for children; ponchos for children; blousons for children; heavy jackets for children; jeans for childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 31, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 30, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance