Drawing for YOSHI

USPTO serial 79269825

YOSHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with YOSHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry L. Rollo

Sherry L. Rollo Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP200 West MadisonSuite 2700Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043High-end restaurants; restaurants; services for providing high-end food and beverages; high-end bar services; high-end coffee shop services; high-end tea room services; preparation and provision of food and drink for consumption on and off the premises; high-end catering services (meals and beverages); high-end take-out restaurant services; high-end cafeteria services; high-end self-service restaurant services; high-end snack-bar services; advice relating to gastronomic cooking; advisory services in the field of culinary art; advisory services relating to food; advisory services relating to cooking recipes; professional consultancy (non-business) in culinary matters; luxury hotel services; accommodation agency services [hotels, boarding houses]; hotel reservations; rental of temporary accommodation; reservations (for temporary accommodation)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 5, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance