USPTO serial 79270044
SHIELD SINCE 1964
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHIELD SINCE 1964?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Automobile wax; creams for tanning the skin; fragrances for automobiles; detergents for automobiles; car shampoos; automobile polishes; vehicle cleaning preparations; carnauba wax for automotive use; shampoos for vehicles; synthetic perfumery; air fragrancing preparations; aromatics for fragrances; polishing preparations; abrasives; bleaching preparations; chemical laundry preparations; aromatherapy preparations; laundry soaking preparations; colour-removing preparations; biological laundry detergents; self-tanning preparations [cosmetics]; glass cleaning preparations; degreasing preparations for engines; cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; dry-cleaning preparations; wipes incorporating cleaning preparations; abrasive preparations for polishing; rust removing preparations; car wax; washing conservation agents; cleansing foam; styling mousse; foam detergents | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Automobile cleaning; car maintenance; vehicle polishing; anti-rust treatment for vehicles; automobile detailing; automobile cleaning and car washing; vehicle detailing; providing information relating to the repair or maintenance of automobiles; providing information relating to the rental of car washing apparatus; cleaning of upholstery; maintenance and repair of upholstery; motor vehicle trim repair; providing self-service car washing facilities; vehicle cleaning; car wash; rental of car-washing apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |