Drawing for SOPHIA

USPTO serial 79270319

SOPHIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEGAL, MOLLY DANIELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOPHIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANGEL HERRERA, JR.

ANGEL HERRERA, JR. ABEL SCHILLINGER, LLP5929 BALCONES DRIVESUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78731

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Breathing apparatus for artificial respiration and artificial respiration apparatus for cough assistance; breathing apparatus for artificial respiration and artificial respiration apparatus for cough treatment; aerosol dispensers for medical use; lavage apparatus, namely, neti pots for therapeutic purposes; therapeutic mouthpieces for the prevention of snoring; therapeutic nose clips for the prevention of snoringSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 12, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 10, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2021LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 21, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 10, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 10, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 22, 2020CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 17, 2020LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Jul 24, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 24, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 10, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance