USPTO serial 79270369
ARGUS-UAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARGUS-UAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Aircraft engines, in particular self-piloting air vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Flight control apparatus; control simulators for aircraft; flight simulators for aircraft; simulators for training in aircraft flight, in particular self-piloting air vehicles; electric control, testing and monitoring apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Aircraft; components and accessories for aircraft, in particular self-piloting air vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Upkeep and maintenance of aircraft, in particular self-piloting air vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic Transmission of images; communication and telecommunication services for air to ground message transmission | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Flight training and instruction, in particular in the field of self-piloting air vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of aircraft, in particular self-piloting air vehicles; design and development of computers and programs for computers; scientific and technological services as well as research and development services relating thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Argus Aviation Technologies AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARGUS-UAV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |