USPTO serial 79270516
PING AN URBAN-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PING AN URBAN-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software applications for mobile phones, downloadable; computer programmes [programs], record; computer software applications, downloadable; quantity indicators; weighing machines; measures; digital signs; network communication equipment; global positioning system [GPS] apparatus; portable media players | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business information; provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; marketing; personnel management consultancy; systemization of information into computer databases; data search in computer files for others; appointment scheduling services [office functions]; accounting; sponsorship search | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance underwriting; financial consultancy; sales of commercial houses; real estate agencies; real estate management; brokerage; guarantees, charitable fund raising; trusteeship, lending against security; financial evaluation of intangible assets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Quality control; biological research; meteorological information; architectural consultation; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; software as a service (SaaS); information technology [IT] consultancy; providing search engines for the internet; computer programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ping An Insurance (Group); Company of China, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PING AN URBAN-TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |