USPTO serial 79270589
AGNESI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGNESI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francesco Braga
Francesco Braga Perani & Partners S.p.A.Piazza Armando Diaz, 7Milano, 20123ITALYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish, not live; ham; poultry; game; charcuterie; dried fruit; preserved fruits; cooked fruits; vegetables, dried; vegetables, preserved; vegetables, cooked; fruit compotes; marmalade; fruit concentrates used as ingredients of food; jellies; soups; fruit purees; canned meat; fish, tinned; preserves of poultry; preserves of game; prepared meals consisting wholly or substantially wholly of meat; prepared meals consisting wholly or substantially wholly of fish; prepared meals consisting wholly or partially of poultry; prepared meals consisting wholly or substantially wholly of game; dried milk powder; dairy products and dairy substitutes, namely, cream and artificial cream; milk-based desserts, namely, Greek yoghurt; yoghurt; drinking yogurts; butter; cheese; edible oils; edible fats; potato-based dumplings; tomato purée; tomato juice for cooking; prepared vegetable dishes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; puffed rice; tapioca; flour; cakes; pizza; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; cereal preparations, namely, cereal-based snack food; breakfast cereals; prepared dishes consisting totally or primarily of pasta; bread; rusks; biscuits; sweets; sweet pastries; confectionery made of sugar; edible ices; sorbets; frozen yoghurt; honey; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; pasta sauce; spices; ravioli; tortellini; fresh pasta; noodles; spaghetti; oat flakes; prepared meals containing principally rice; ready-to-eat meals primarily made from cereals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |