Drawing for GEL

USPTO serial 79270661

GEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective helmets for sports and their parts and fittings; protective helmets for safety and their parts and fittings; protective helmets for motorcycle and their parts and fittings; protective helmets for bicycle and their parts and fittings; protection devices for personal use against accidents; shoes for protection against accident and their parts and fittings; clothing for motorcycle riders for protection against accident and attachments; pads for protection [parts of clothing for motorcycle riders for protection against accident]; protective cases for telecommunication machines and apparatus; protective cases for portable telecommunication machines and apparatus; protective cases for personal digital assistants; protective cases for smartphones; protective cases for hard disk devices; protective cases for tablet computers; protective covers for telecommunication machines and apparatus; protective covers for portable telecommunication machines and apparatus; protective covers for personal digital assistants; protective covers for smartphonesACTIVE—
028Protective pads for sports; protective pads [parts of clothing for sports]; shock protectors for sports use; shock protectors for athletic use; body protectors for bicycle riding; body protectors for motor and motorcycle racing; shock protectors for climbing; ice hockey pucks; balls for ball games; sports equipment; elbow guards for protection against accident; knee-pads for protection against accident; body protectors for motorcycle ridersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2022FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 28, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 13, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance