USPTO serial 79270662
KARTINA SATELLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRANDA, JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KARTINA SATELLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for the processing of images; computers; data processing apparatus; decoders; receiving antennas for satellite broadcast; apparatus for recording data; apparatus for broadcasting sound, data or images; digital signal processors; integrated circuit cards [smart cards]; readers [data processing equipment]; satellite processors; smart card readers; sound and picture recording apparatus; audio processing apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business administration and management; on-line advertising and marketing services; production and distribution of radio and television commercials; advertising | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Information services relating to telecommunications; broadcasting of radio and television programmes; broadcasting of programmes via the internet; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; webcasting services; communications services; communication via computer terminals, by digital transmission or by satellite; satellite transmission of sounds, images, signals and data; communication services by satellite; satellite transmission; message sending and receiving services; transmission of interactive television program guides; transmission of radio and television programmes by satellite; transmission of sound, video and information; broadcasting of video and audio programming over the internet; leasing satellite transmission capacity; rental of telecommunication equipment; rental of equipment for broadcasting; video-on-demand transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |