USPTO serial 79270679
EAT NO EVIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAT NO EVIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Liebowitz
Rebecca Liebowitz Venable LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, candy and chocolate; confectionery made of sugar; nut confectionery made of sugar; nut confectionery, namely, yogurt-covered nuts, chocolate-coated nuts, and chocolate spreads containing nuts; coated nuts, namely, yogurt-covered nuts and chocolate-coated nuts; sweets; candy bars; chocolate; chocolate based products, namely, chocolate based ingredient for use in confectionery products, chocolate, chocolate candies, chocolate bars, chocolate-based meal replacement bars, chocolate containing nutrients, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars, chocolate mousse, chocolate cakes, chocolate chips, chocolate syrup, chocolate powder, chocolate sauce and chocolate topping; chocolate and cocoa-based beverages; hot chocolate; chocolate spreads; sweet spreads, namely, chocolate-based spreads, cocoa spreads and chocolate spreads containing nuts; biscuits, cakes, pastries, cookies, buns; savoury snacks, namely, grain-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, cereal-based snack foods, corn-based snack foods, and quinoa-based snack foods; snack foods, namely, grain-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, cereal-based snack foods, corn-based snack foods, quinoa-based snack foods and chocolate-based snack foods; bubble gum; chewing gum; candy mints; sherbets; fruit jelly candy; marshmallows; liquorice; lollipops; chocolate truffles; confectionery, namely, pastilles; boiled sweets; confectionery containing jam, namely, candy containing jam; confectionery containing jellies, namely, fruit jelly candy; prepared desserts, namely, bakery desserts; frozen bakery desserts; ice cream; imitation ice cream; cereals, namely, breakfast cereals and processed cereals; cereal-based snacks; cereal bars; cereal-based energy bars; breakfast cereals, including hot breakfast cereals; high-protein cereal bars; cereal-based snack bars; crisps made of cereals; rice crisps; whole wheat crisps; oat based snack foods; granola; sugar; sugar cubes and sticks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 25, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |