USPTO serial 79270770
LICET STUDIOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LICET STUDIOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Granting of licences for intellectual property and copyright; copyright management and licensing; intellectual property consultancy; advisory services relating to intellectual property licensing; licensing industrial property rights; licensing of intellectual property; licensing of trademarks; licensing of intellectual property; management and commercial exploitation of industrial property rights and copyright in regard to audio capture and/or video recordings by licensing; management and commercial exploitation of industrial property rights and copyright of third parties in the video and music industry by licensing; management and commercial exploitation of industrial property rights and copyright in the video and music industry by licensing; licensing services relating to music and video publishing; licensing of rights to films, television and video productions; licensing authority services; legal administration of licences; commercial exploitation of industrial property rights in the video and music industry by licensing; leasing and allocation of broadcasting and transmission rights, as well as audio-visual and other rights for the exploitation of radio, television and other audio and video production and events and of rights in public performances and performances in the field of entertainment; registration of domain names; online social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |