USPTO serial 79271162
INTERICA ONEVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERICA ONEVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Professional consultancy relating to data processing; recordal of seismic data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data backup and recovery services; recovery of computer data; computer database consultancy services; computerised analysis of data; consulting services relating to computer data handling; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data [not physical conversion]; data security services [firewalls]; database design; design of computer databases; design services for data processing systems; design and development of data programs, data processing programmes and data processing systems; development of systems for the processing of data; development of systems for the storage of data; development of systems for the transmission of data; disaster recovery services for data communications systems; engineering consultancy relating to data processing; engineering services relating to automatic data processing; engineering services relating to data processing; engineering services relating to data processing apparatus; engineering services relating to data processing technology; evaluation of performance of data-processing against bench-mark references; preparation of computer programs for data processing; preparation of data processing programmes; technological advisory services relating to data processing software and hardware; technical data analysis services; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |