Drawing for PAMICA

USPTO serial 79271644

PAMICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIOS, SASHA BOSHART
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PAMICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Di Li

Di Li Di Li Law, P.C.17700 Castleton Street, Ste 353City of Industry, CA 97148UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Insulating and protective dielectric materials; insulating tapes; insulators for electric mains; insulators for cables; insulators for railway tracks; paper for electrical capacitorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 7, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance