Drawing for VISIONMASTER NET

USPTO serial 79271719

VISIONMASTER NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISIONMASTER NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Brucker

William J. Brucker STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 Enterprise, Suite 250Aliso Viejo, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radar navigation devices; GPS navigation devices; marine vessel guidance devices; tracking and targeting devices for military and rescue marine vessels; PC based map generating devices for navigational charts; marine navigation apparatus for marine vessels; navigation compasses; navigational instruments, namely navigation apparatus for marine vessels; computer hardware for the processing of positioning data; radar systems consisting primarily of radar displays, radar antennas, transceivers and man-machine interface control panels; radar displays; display devices, namely display monitors; antennas; electronic panel control units; computer networking and data communications equipment, namely, network routers; electronic data processing equipment; data networks for interconnecting marine vessel electronics and navigation systems; network controlling apparatus, namely, network routers; computer interface apparatus; Interface cards for data processing apparatus; recorded computer software for marine vessel bridge management, navigation, displaying navigational charts, vessel control, vessel tracking and tracking sea state conditions; recorded computer software for the processing of positioning data; all of the foregoing relating to marine vessels and marine vessel navigationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2021MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 25, 2021ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 24, 2021EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 25, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance