USPTO serial 79271874
JUICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LARKEY, MICHAEL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIC LIN
VIC LIN INNOVATION CAPITAL LAW GROUP, LLP19800 MACARTHUR BLVD., SUITE 280IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric vehicle charging systems comprising charging stations for electric vehicles and electric charging cables; charging stations for electric vehicles and other equipment for charging and control of electric vehicles, namely, electric cords and electric batteries; electrical charge regulators for electric vehicles; electric cables for vehicles; downloadable software for the management of charging stations, for charging electric vehicles and other electrical loads and relative generation systems; downloadable software applications for the management of charging stations; downloadable software applications to locate electric vehicle charging stations | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Vehicle battery charging; battery charging services for electric vehicles; vehicle service stations in the nature of refueling and maintenance services; provision of information relating to battery charging services via charging stations for electric vehicles; maintenance and repair of electric vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (Paas) featuring computer software platforms for cloud-based management of data collection, data storage, analytics, rate and timing control, and for monitoring of electric generation and demand; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the collection, storage, analysis, control and management of data in the residential, commercial and industrial markets for use in optimization of electric vehicle charging equipment and apparatus and other electric loads and generation; cloud-based platform as a service (Paas) featuring computer software platforms for use in data optimization of load balancing, energy prices and environmental signals; computer programming services for controlling charging apparatus and other remotely controllable electric loads, for use by electric grid operators, utility companies and energy market participants in the residential, commercial, and industrial markets, through operating computer systems and computer networks; design and development of energy management software in relation to aggregated electric demand, electric vehicle charging stations, energy storage systems and other electric loads and generating systems; computer technology consultancy in the nature of technical support services in relation to aggregated electric demand, electric vehicle charging stations, energy storage systems and other electric loads and generating systems; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the remote management of electric vehicle charging stations and control of networked electric vehicle charging stations and other electric loads and generating sources; computer programming services related to communication, monitoring and control of electric vehicles; product research and development services relating to charging stations for electric vehicles, charge rectifiers for electric vehicles, chargers, current rectifiers, rectifier modules, electric sockets, chargers, accumulators in the nature of batteries, battery chargers, electric cables for vehicles; development of software for the management of charging stations, for charging electric vehicles and other electrical loads and relative generation systems; platform as a service (Paas) featuring computer software platforms for consumption management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |