Drawing for ;DOCSWAVE

USPTO serial 79272070

;DOCSWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6138624Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 1, 2020
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ;DOCSWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $425

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Gregory Schivley

G. Gregory Schivley Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.100 Bloomfield Hills ParkwaySuite 200Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042website development for others; providing search engines for the internet; providing internet security programs, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software that allows users to take measures to protect the security of their data and internet connections; management of websites for others for electronic commerce; development of computer game software; computer software development; computer software design; computer software consultancy; design of computer software; installation of computer software; computer software research; maintenance of computer software; advisory and development service of computer software; computer system design; design and development of computer systems; computer programming; development of computer programs; consulting services in the field of cloud computing, namely, consulting about cloud computing networks and cloud computing applications; installation and maintenance of cloud computing network application software; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable operating software for accessing to cloud computing networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 27, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 1, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 29, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 28, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance