Drawing for REN

USPTO serial 79272212

REN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUMMERY, MARY M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MAKIKO COFFLAND

MAKIKO COFFLAND CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 8, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 8, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 28, 2022RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 4, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 28, 2021LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 23, 2021LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 22, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 22, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 10, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 24, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance