Drawing for BLAST MASTER

USPTO serial 79272282

BLAST MASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERDMAN, RACHEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLAST MASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BOBBY A GHAJAR

BOBBY A GHAJAR COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NWSUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer game programs for use on mobile devices being smart phones and tablet computers via the Internet; none of the foregoing being video games, computer games and games on CD-ROMsACTIVE—
041Providing on-line computer games; providing information on-line relating to computer games; providing entertainment information relating to computer games and computer game applications via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 29, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 29, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 22, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 3, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 3, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 29, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 3, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2019RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 27, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 26, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance