USPTO serial 79272656
PRESAGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 2021
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PRESAGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Adelaide SA, AU
Adelaide SA, AU
Adelaide SA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jared M. Barrett
Jared M. Barrett Seed IP Law Group LLP701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400Seattle, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advisory services relating to computer software; development of computer software applications; development of software; hosting of software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for Artificial Intelligence (AI) based analysis of medical images and medical data for use in the field of medical diagnostic services, medical testing and analysis; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for Artificial Intelligence (AI) based analysis of medical images and data for medical diagnostic and clinical decision making including software for the development and training of AI models using data from multiple sites for use in the field of medical diagnostic services, medical testing and analysis; software creation; software engineering; computer software advisory services; computer software design; computer software development; computer software engineering; computer support services, namely, technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; consultancy in the design and development of computer software; design of computer software; development of computer software * ; all aforementioned software not for medical testing * | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical diagnostic services, namely, medical [ testing and ] analysis in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) based analysis of medical images and data for medical diagnostic and clinical decision making | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 4, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |